Sunday, November 22, 2015




To me, intellectual perseverance is thinking on your feet and staying on your feet…figuratively speaking.  If I find myself in a verbal dispute or argument, I try to volley back with fact and not with fallacies or conjecture.  I avoid finding myself on the proverbial ropes and throwing my “gloves up” while not using the boxing ring ropes in a  Mohamed Ali “Rope-A-Dope” to wear out my intellectual sparring partner.  I “punch” back with fact.  I swing my mental punches with steely knowledge of fact and do not duck and weave with nonsense.

Intellectual perseverance will be very important as I progress in my studies.  I am here to increase my knowledge base and not just sharpen it.  I am on a constant odyssey to improve and refine my intellect.  I wish to lead by example and not be the example of what not to do.  In my current occupation, I teach teenagers to be better citizens.  This course will help me do a better job at it.
I have ingested the required reading and have also done additional research to improve my chances of doing well.  I found the definitions of “Critical Thinking” in keeping with my existing knowledge and expectations.  I learned much from reading the variety of intellectual traits at http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/valuable-intellectual-traits/528

As I scrolled through the website, I was reminded of the intellectual traits that I either practiced or did not.  Below, I will touch on each and indicate my practice or nonpractice.
·         Intellectual Humility:  Practiced.  I am a very humble person.  I try my best to appreciate others and their input.  I do not claim to know more than I actually do and, if I do not, I inform the other that I am unaware but will do the research to educate myself.  If I find that the other person’s input is unjustified, I provide them with the correct information and where to find it.
·         Intellectual Courage:  Practiced.  This goes hand in hand with Intellectual Humility.  I have no qualms with disputing with others and if I am confident in my knowledge, I have no problems arguing fact.  However, if I find myself incorrect, I also have no problem coming into compliance with proven and justified fact.  While on Active Duty, I often found myself being stared at with bewildered eyes when questioning a General about their comment or input.
·         Intellectual Empathy:  Practiced.  I may be too empathetic to fault.  I cry when people cry and stress when others stress.  It has become one of my perceived weaknesses.  I even cried the first time that I watched Charlie Brown’s “Snoopy Come Home”.  I often find myself being sucked into other’s tomes and stories.  More often, than not, I feel their feelings as they wind their yarns.  Sometimes even emphatically agreeing with them.
·          Intellectual Autonomy:  Practiced.  I own all of my beliefs.  I do not fear to share them and all of my decisions and opinions are my own.  I may be offered input but may graciously decline it.  I think for myself.  If something seems rational and true, I fall in line.  I am a fan of reality.  I am a fan of vetted fact. 
·         Intellectual Integrity:  Practiced.  I try to practice what I preach.  When I share information with my subordinates I know it is true, but if I find that it is not, I will correct myself and let all that I have shared information with that I was incorrect and provide the correct information.
·         Confidence In Reason:  Practiced.  As an Army Leader, I always encouraged my Soldiers to come to their own conclusions.  As a High School teacher, I do the same.  I want my Cadets to think for themselves.  Do their own research.  I never give them the answer.  I want them to do their own research and find the answers on their own.  I correct them and steer them if they are off track and praise them and share their findings if they are correct.
·         Fairmindedness:  Always practiced.  I accept all input with grace and treat them with the same output.  Basically, I treat everyone the same.


Good leaders are developed.  It has taken me years to get to the point that I am at.  A good leader should be a critical thinker.  They should think on their feet and always admit when they are wrong.  

No comments:

Post a Comment